Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Current Status Bill Number:View additional legislative information at the LPITS web site.4673 Type of Legislation:House Resolution HR Introducing Body:House Introduced Date:20000224 Primary Sponsor:Davenport All Sponsors:Davenport Drafted Document Number:l:\council\bills\ggs\22502som00.doc Residing Body:House Current Committee:Judiciary Committee 25 HJ Subject:Supreme Court Chief Justice requests to investigate action of certain circuit court judge in release of sex offender History Body Date Action Description Com Leg Involved ______ ________ ______________________________________ _______ ____________ House 20000224 Introduced, referred to Committee 25 HJ Versions of This Bill
REQUESTING THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT TO INVESTIGATE AND RESPOND TO THE ACTION OF A CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE WHO EXHIBITED A SERIOUS LACK OF CONCERN FOR THE SAFETY OF THE SPARTANBURG COMMUNITY BY ORDERING THE RELEASE OF A PERSON CHARGED WITH A VIOLENT OFFENSE WHO HAS A LENGTHY CRIMINAL RECORD OF SEXUAL ASSAULT OFFENSES WHEN THE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE WAS NOT ABLE, BECAUSE OF REASONS BEYOND THEIR CONTROL, TO TRY THE CASE BY THE DEADLINE IMPOSED BY THE JUDGE, AND, WHEN THE CASE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CALLED TO TRIAL, THE ACCUSED HAD FLED, IS NOW BEYOND THE CONFINEMENT OF A PENAL INSTITUTION, AND POSSIBLY THREATENS THE SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY.
Whereas, a convicted rapist with a thirty-four year history of sexual assault charges was released on a personal recognizance bond by a circuit court judge when solicitors of the seventh circuit could not, because of circumstances beyond their control, meet the judge's order to bring the case to trial; and
Whereas, the person accused has a history of violence against women and children that extends back to a 1976 criminal sexual assault charge for which he served a lengthy sentence; and
Whereas, since his release from that sentence, the accused has been charged with multiple counts of sexual assault offenses on two separate occasions; and
Whereas, the judge ordered the trial of the accused to begin by February 11, 2000, or he would order the accused released; and
Whereas, the judge did release the accused, while knowing of his long criminal record of violent offenses against women and children; and
Whereas, when his trial was called two weeks later, the accused was not present and his whereabouts were not known by his attorney; and
Whereas, by releasing the accused, the judge has put the community's safety at risk; and
Whereas, it is appropriate to question whether exceptional circumstances did not, in fact, exist, in order to keep the accused confined until his trial. Now, therefore,
The House of Representatives requests the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court to investigate and respond to the actions of a circuit court judge who exhibited a serious lack of concern for the safety of the Spartanburg community by ordering the release of a person charged with a violent offense who has a lengthy criminal record of sexual assault offenses when the solicitor's office was not able, because of factors beyond their control, to try the case by the deadline imposed by the judge, and, subsequently, when the case was called to trial, the accused had fled, is now beyond the confinement of a penal institution, and possibly threatens the safety of the community.
Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court.
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, December 9, 2009 at 9:30 A.M.