South Carolina General Assembly
115th Session, 2003-2004

Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

H. 3627

STATUS INFORMATION

House Resolution
Sponsors: Rep. Harrell
Document Path: l:\council\bills\ggs\22862htc03.doc

Introduced in the House on February 18, 2003
Adopted by the House on February 26, 2003

Summary: Appropriations Bill, no permanent law to be included (Part II's)

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

     Date      Body   Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   2/18/2003  House   Introduced HJ-8
   2/18/2003  House   Referred to Committee on Ways and Means HJ-8
   2/20/2003  House   Committee report: Favorable Ways and Means HJ-35
   2/26/2003  House   Adopted HJ-26
   2/26/2003  House   Roll call Yeas-119  Nays-0 HJ-27

View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

2/18/2003
2/20/2003

(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

COMMITTEE REPORT

February 20, 2003

H. 3627

Introduced by Rep. Harrell

S. Printed 2/20/03--H.

Read the first time February 18, 2003.

            

THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS

To whom was referred a House Resolution (H. 3627) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that no permanent law, i.e., Part II's, should be included in the general appropriations bill for fiscal year 2003- 2004, etc., respectfully

REPORT:

That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass:

ROBERT W. HARRELL, JR. for Committee.

            

A HOUSE RESOLUTION

EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THAT NO PERMANENT LAW, I.E., PART II'S, SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS BILL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004, WHEN THE BILL IS UNDER CONSIDERATION IN THE HOUSE BEGINNING THE WEEK OF MARCH 10, 2003.

Whereas, fiscal year 2003-2004 promises to be an extraordinarily difficult year for many important and worthwhile state programs because of agency base budget reductions; and

Whereas, the long established practice of adding new permanent law, i.e., Part II's, in what should be a temporary spending measure has sometimes had the effect of increasing appropriations above what they would otherwise be if the permanent law measure had been fully vetted and debated in the committee process; and

Whereas, in this year of base budget cuts it is essential that the House of Representatives take no action that would require increased overall appropriations because of legislation that considered in isolation could not pass the House of Representatives. Now, therefore,

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives:

That the members of the House of Representatives, by this resolution, express the sense of the House of Representatives that no permanent law, i.e., Part II's, should be included in the general appropriations bill for fiscal year 2003-2004, when the bill is under consideration in the House beginning the week of March 10, 2003.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on Monday, December 7, 2009 at 10:27 A.M.