Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
The House assembled at 9:00 a.m.
Deliberations were opened with prayer by Rev. Charles E. Seastrunk, Jr., as follows:
Our thought for today is from Isaiah 43:16: "Thus says the Lord, who makes a way in the sea, a path in the mighty waters, ..."
Let us pray. Gracious God, may we all recognize the works of Your hand. We give thanks to You for providing these Representatives the will to accomplish the good things which come from Your hand to our hand. Give these Representatives and staff strength and courage as they go through the budget process. Bless them and those who lead us in the Nation and State. Give the Speaker the necessary strength and stamina to lead us through the day's business. Protect our defenders of freedom. Heal the wounds, those seen and those hidden, of those who suffer and sacrifice for our freedom. Lord, in Your mercy, hear our prayers. Amen.
Pursuant to Rule 6.3, the House of Representatives was led in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America by the SPEAKER.
After corrections to the Journal of the proceedings of yesterday, the SPEAKER ordered it confirmed.
The roll call of the House of Representatives was taken resulting as follows:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bowers Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McEachern W. J. McLeod Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Newton Norman Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Yow
I came in after the roll call and was present for the Session on Tuesday, March 22.
Terry Alexander Douglas "Doug" Brannon Grady Brown Heather Crawford Laurie Funderburk Dan Hamilton Chris Hart Leon Howard Ralph Kennedy H. B. "Chip" Limehouse Peter McCoy, Jr. Cezar McKnight Mia S. McLeod Harold Mitchell Chris Murphy Wendy Nanney Joseph Neal Mandy Powers Norrell Richard "Rick" Quinn Leola Robinson-Simpson Todd Rutherford G. Murrell Smith McLain R. "Mac" Toole David Weeks Mark Willis Beth Bernstein
SPEAKER IN CHAIR
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
The SPEAKER granted Rep. THAYER a leave of absence for the day due to medical reasons.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. BERNSTEIN a temporary leave of absence due to a prior commitment.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. GAMBRELL a leave of absence for the day.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. ALLISON a leave of absence for the day due to medical reasons.
Announcement was made that Dr. M. David Mitchell of Spartanburg was the Doctor of the Day for the General Assembly.
In accordance with House Rule 5.2 below:
"5.2 Every bill before presentation shall have its title endorsed; every report, its title at length; every petition, memorial, or other paper, its prayer or substance; and, in every instance, the name of the member presenting any paper shall be endorsed and the papers shall be presented by the member to the Speaker at the desk. A member may add his name to a bill or resolution or a co-sponsor of a bill or resolution may remove his name at any time prior to the bill or resolution receiving passage on second reading. The member or co-sponsor shall notify the Clerk of the House in writing of his desire to have his name added or removed from the bill or resolution. The Clerk of the House shall print the member's or co-sponsor's written notification in the House Journal. The removal or addition of a name does not apply to a bill or resolution sponsored by a committee."
Bill Number: H. 3249 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/21/16 W. J. MCLEOD
Bill Number: H. 3928 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/21/16 KING
Bill Number: H. 4093 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/21/16 DUCKWORTH
Bill Number: H. 4302 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/21/16 ERICKSON
Bill Number: H. 4881 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/21/16 STRINGER
Bill Number: H. 5109 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/21/16 DUCKWORTH and COBB-HUNTER
I inadvertently was added as a sponsor to H. 4537. I wish the record to reflect that I did not intend to add my name to this Bill.
Rep. Harold Mitchell, Jr.
After recusing myself from voting on Section 33 of H. 5001, the General Appropriation Bill, I inadvertently voted on this Section yesterday. I wish the record to reflect that I meant to abstain from voting.
Rep. Dennis Moss
The SPEAKER granted Rep. HAMILTON a temporary leave of absence due to family medical reasons.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. WILLIS a temporary leave of absence.
Debate was resumed on the following Bill, the pending question being the consideration of Part IA:
H. 5001 -- Ways and Means Committee: A BILL TO MAKE APPROPRIATIONS AND TO PROVIDE REVENUES TO MEET THE ORDINARY EXPENSES OF STATE GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2016, TO REGULATE THE EXPENDITURE OF SUCH FUNDS, AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE OPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT DURING THIS FISCAL YEAR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
Rep. TAYLOR proposed the following Amendment No. 19 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\che core mission functions.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 28, immediately after line 9, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
NEW-Accounting Manager I
94,184 94,184
(2.00) (2.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 28, immediately after line 9, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
NEW-Program Manager I
300,000 300,000
(5.00) (5.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 28, immediately after line 9, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
NEW-Program Manager II
313,334 313,334
(4.00) (4.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 28, immediately after line 9, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
NEW-Program Manager III
101,000 101,000
(1.00) (1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 28, immediately after line 9, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
NEW-Program Coordinator I
38,000 38,000
(1.00) (1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 28, line 13, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
109,000 109,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 29, line 24, opposite /Employer Contributions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
289,700 289,700
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. TAYLOR explained the amendment.
Rep. TAYLOR spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. MERRILL spoke against the amendment.
Rep. MERRILL spoke against the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. W. J. MCLEOD spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. MERRILL moved to table the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham G. A. Brown Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Delleney Dillard Erickson Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Long Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Ott Pitts Pope Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Tinkler Toole White Whitmire Williams Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Daning Douglas Felder Funderburk George Hixon Loftis Lowe McKnight W. J. McLeod Norman Norrell Southard Stringer Taylor Wells Willis
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern W. J. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Chumley Corley Hill G. R. Smith
Section 11 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cobb-Hunter Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
Section 17 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Ott Parks Pitts Pope Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Burns Chumley Hill Nanney Norman Putnam G. R. Smith Toole
Section 19 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Newton Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bedingfield Chumley Hill Norman
Section 20A was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bradley G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bedingfield Hill
Section 20F was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Newton Norman Norrell Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
Section 21 was adopted.
Rep. NORMAN proposed the following Amendment No. 38 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\norman ag marketing.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 44, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, page 120, line 3, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
500,000 500,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 44, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, page 120, line 21, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
300,000 300,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. NORMAN explained the amendment.
Rep. NORMAN spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL spoke against the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL spoke against the amendment and moved to table the amendment.
Rep. NORMAN demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Bamberg Bannister Bowers G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Ballentine Bedingfield Bradley Corley Daning Felder Fry Hardee Hill Huggins Long Nanney Newton Norman Putnam Ryhal Southard Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Corley Hardee Norman
Section 44 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bedingfield Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Kennedy Kirby Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Weeks Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
G. R. Smith
Section 49 was adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on Section 49, Part IA of H. 5001, the General Appropriation Bill. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of adopting the Section.
Rep. Patsy G. Knight
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 50 was adopted.
Reps. WHITE and SIMRILL proposed the following Amendment No. 69 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\water and sewer 1a.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 54, RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY, page 145, immediately after line 13, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
Statewide Water and Sewer Fund
4,250,000 4,250,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kennedy Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lucas McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 54, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. PITTS, POPE, COBB-HUNTER, CLEMMONS, HOSEY and ERICKSON proposed the following Amendment No. 24 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\circuit court judges x1.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 57, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, page 147, immediately after line 22 by inserting new lines to read:
Column 3 Column 4
New Positions:
Circuit Court Judge
410,715 410,715
(3.00) (3.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 57, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, page 147, immediately after line 25, by inserting new lines to read:
Column 3 Column 4
New Positions:
Administrative Assistant
89,652 89,652
(3.00) (3.00)
Court Reporter 135,915 135,915
(3.00) (3.00)
Law Clerk 138,420 138,420
(3.00) (3.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 57, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, page 147, line 27, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
69,000 69,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 57, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, page 149, line 19, opposite /Employer Contributions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
401,244 401,244
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PITTS explained the amendment.
Rep. PITTS spoke in favor of the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kennedy Kirby Limehouse Loftis Long Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
After recusing myself from voting on Part IA, Section 57 of H. 5001, the General Appropriation Bill, I inadvertently voted on Amendment No. 24, which concerns Section 57. I wish the record to reflect that I meant to abstain from voting.
Rep. Gary E. Clary
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on Amendment No. 24, Section 57, Part IA of H. 5001, the General Appropriation Bill. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of adopting Amendment No. 24.
Rep. Terry Alexander
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Horne Hosey Huggins Jefferson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Long Lowe Lucas Mack McEachern W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Tinkler Toole Weeks Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 57, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. WILLIAMS proposed the following Amendment No. 61 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\williams, fathers and families.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 60, PROSECUTION COORDINATION COMMISSION, page 153, lines 10 - 11, opposite /Center for Father and Families/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
400,000 400,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WILLIAMS explained the amendment.
Rep. PITTS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Reps. PITTS, POPE, COBB-HUNTER, CLEMMONS, HOSEY AND ERICKSON proposed the following Amendment No. 93 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\007\CDV, PCC, X2.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 60, PROSECUTION COORDINATION COMMISSION, page 153, immediately after line 12, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
Summary Court Domestic Violence Prosecution
2,980,117 2,980,117
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PITTS explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 60, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. FINLAY proposed the following Amendment No. 41 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\djj, finlay.docx), which was rejected:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 67, DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, page 169, line 20, opposite /other operating expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
50,000 50,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. FINLAY explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon Burns Chumley Clemmons Daning Duckworth Finlay Fry Funderburk George Goldfinch Hardee Hill Loftis W. J. McLeod Nanney Norman Ott Ryhal G. R. Smith Stringer Toole
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Crosby Dillard Douglas Forrester Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hayes Henegan Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Lowe Mack McCoy M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Norrell Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Robinson-Simpson Simrill J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Tinkler Wells Whipper Williams Willis Yow
So, the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clyburn Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Dillard Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norman Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 67 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Jordan Kennedy King Kirby Knight Limehouse Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Corley Hill
Section 71 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Felder Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norrell Ott Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Corley Norman
Section 72 was adopted.
Reps. WHITE, LUCAS, SIMRILL and LIMEHOUSE proposed the following Amendment No. 35 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\dmv online.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 2, opposite /Executive Director/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
122,969
(1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 4, opposite /Classified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
4,377,002
(118.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 6, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
203,478
(2.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 8, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
85,174
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 9, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
63,058
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 16, opposite /Classified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
20,953,097
(792.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 18, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by increasing the amount in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,776,149
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 19, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
12,603,340
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 24, opposite /Classified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
4,186,374
(157.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 26, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
98,378
(1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 28, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
331,037
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 29, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,698,724
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 191, line 30, opposite /Plate Replacement/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
3,800,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 4, opposite /Classified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
3,588,556
(119.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 6, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
98,111
(1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 8, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
50,606
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 9, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
3,115,333
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 14, opposite /Classified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,683,334
(50.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 16, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
91,863
(1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 18, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
28,500
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 19, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
292,557
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 20, opposite /Facial Recognition Program/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
245,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 25, opposite /Classified Positions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,989,664
(50.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 192, line 27, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
6,606,034
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 82, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, page 193, line 1, opposite /Employee Benefits/ by increasing the amount(s) in Column 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
14,911,662
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cole Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Weeks Wells White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norman Ott Parks Pitts Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells White Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 82, as amended, was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Erickson Felder Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mack McCoy M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Corley Hill Norman
Section 83 was adopted.
Reps. WHITE, LUCAS, SIMRILL and LIMEHOUSE proposed the following Amendment No. 33 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\shf auth incr .docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 84, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, page 199, line 3, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amount in Column 3 by:
Column 3 Column 4
100,000,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Newton Norman Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. WHITE, LUCAS, SIMRILL and LIMEHOUSE proposed the following Amendment No. 31 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\transfer to shf.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 84, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, page 200, immediately after line 9, by inserting a new line to read: Column 3 Column 4
VII. Non-recurring
State Highway Fund
15,320,000 15,320,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Newton Norman Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
G. A. Brown Southard
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norman Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Toole Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 84, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. PARKS moved that the House recede until 2:15 p.m., which was agreed to.
Further proceedings were interrupted by the House receding, the pending question being consideration of Part IA, Section 86.
At 2:15 p.m. the House resumed, the SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE in the Chair.
The question of a quorum was raised.
A quorum was later present.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. KENNEDY a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.
Debate was resumed on the following Bill, the pending question being the consideration of Part IA, Section 86.
H. 5001 -- Ways and Means Committee: A BILL TO MAKE APPROPRIATIONS AND TO PROVIDE REVENUES TO MEET THE ORDINARY EXPENSES OF STATE GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2016, TO REGULATE THE EXPENDITURE OF SUCH FUNDS, AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE OPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT DURING THIS FISCAL YEAR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bedingfield Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Douglas Duckworth Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Knight Loftis Lucas McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 86 was adopted.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN proposed the following Amendment No. 10 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\state auditor fte adjustment.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 105, SFAA-STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE, page 237, lines 11-12, opposite /Classified Positions/ by Increasing the FTE(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
(1.00) (1.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 105, SFAA-STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE, page 237, lines 15-16, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
(1.00) (1.00)
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bradley G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Nanney Neal Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 105, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. WHITE, HERBKERSMAN and COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 34 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\005\EMPLOYEE PAY, HEALTH AND RETIREMENT INCREASE - 2.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 106, STATEWIDE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, page 238, line 3, opposite /Base Pay Increase/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
17,197,534 17,197,534
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 106, STATEWIDE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, page 238, lines 7-8, opposite /Health Insurance-Employer Contributions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
330,161 330,161
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 106, STATEWIDE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, page 238, line 9, opposite /SCRS Employer Contributions/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
182,311 182,311
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. NEAL spoke in favor of the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Nanney Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
The amendment was then adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber when the roll call was taken on Amendment No. 34 to Section 106, Part IA of H. 5001, the General Appropriation Bill. I missed the two minute roll call vote, however, if I had been present, I would have joined the unanimous chorus of votes and would have voted in favor of Amendment No. 34, to provide a 2% pay raise for State Employees.
Rep. James E. Smith
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE granted Rep. NANNEY a temporary leave of absence.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 49 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\pay increase 3%.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 106, STATEWIDE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, page 238, line 3, opposite /base pay increase/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
32,400,000 32,400,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 49 was out of order because the Amendment appropriated more than five million dollars and did not include the corresponding appropriation decrease in the same section or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation decrease would be made.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke against the Point.
Rep. J. E. SMITH spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE referred to Section 5.3B, stating that an amendment which has the effect of appropriating funds in excess of five millions dollars during the fiscal year stated within the Appropriation Bill shall include within the amendment the corresponding appropriation revenue decrease within the same section that shall fully fund the amendments proposed appropriations or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation revenue decrease would occur. The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE sustained the Point of Order and ruled Amendment No. 49 to be out of order.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 50 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\PAY INCREASE 2.5%.DOCX), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 106, STATEWIDE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, page 238, line 3, opposite /base pay increase/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
24,300,000 24,300,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 50 was out of order because the amendment appropriated more than five million dollars and did not include the corresponding appropriation decrease in the same section or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation decrease would be made.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke against the Point.
Rep. J. E. SMITH spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE referred to Section 5.3B, stating that an amendment which has the effect of appropriating funds in excess of five millions dollars during the fiscal year stated within the Appropriation Bill shall include within the amendment the corresponding appropriation revenue decrease within the same section that shall fully fund the amendments proposed appropriations or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation revenue decrease would occur. The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE sustained the Point of Order and ruled Amendment No. 50 out of order.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bedingfield Bowers Bradley G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 106, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. OTT, GEORGE, KING, COBB-HUNTER and KNIGHT proposed the following Amendment No. 52 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\5% increase to lgf - ott.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 113, AID TO SUBDIVISIONS - STATE TREASURER, page 247, line 3, opposite /AID - Local Government Fund/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
10,630,971 10,630,971
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. OTT explained the amendment.
Rep. OTT spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 52 was out of order because the Amendment appropriated more than five million dollars and did not include the corresponding appropriation decrease in the same section or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation decrease would be made.
Rep. OTT spoke against the Point.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke against the Point.
Rep. KING spoke against the Point.
Rep. ALEXANDER spoke against the Point.
Rep. HILL spoke to the Point.
Rep. KNIGHT spoke against the Point.
Rep. BAMBERG spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER stated the specific language of the Rule states that an appropriation in excess of five million dollars is required to make a specific appropriation reduction in the same section or have attached to it a document explaining where a specific appropriation will be made. The SPEAKER stated that a reference stating that the appropriated funds would come from available surplus or balance did not make a specific appropriation reduction. He stated further that the specific appropriation reduction should reference a page and line where the dollars are to be obtained and the rule was required to be narrowly and strictly construed. The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order and ruled Amendment No. 52 out of order.
Rep. BAMBERG moved that the House recede until 5:42 p.m.
Rep. BRADLEY moved to table the motion.
Rep. BAMBERG demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anthony Atwater Bales Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon George Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Long Lowe Lucas McCoy Merrill V. S. Moss Murphy Pitts Putnam Quinn Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Ballentine Bamberg Bowers R. L. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Collins Corley Dillard Douglas Funderburk Gilliard Govan Henegan Hill Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pope Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Southard Tinkler Weeks Whipper Williams
So, the motion to recede was tabled.
Reps. SOUTHARD, CHUMLEY, HOSEY, RIVERS, CROSBY, DANING, BAMBERG, W. J. McLEOD, KIRBY, ALEXANDER, GEORGE, YOW, KING, KNIGHT, GAGNON, COBB-HUNTER, HENEGAN and MITCHELL proposed the following Amendment No. 53 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\fully fund local government fund- southard.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 113, AID TO SUBDIVISIONS - STATE TREASURER, page 247, line 3, opposite /Aid - Local Government Fund/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
100,598,115 100,598,115
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. SOUTHARD explained the amendment.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 53 was out of order because the Amendment appropriated more than five million dollars and did not include the corresponding appropriation decrease in the same section or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation decrease would be made.
The SPEAKER referred to Section 5.3B and sustained the Point of Order, ruling Amendment No. 53 to be out of order.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. W. J. MCLEOD a temporary leave of absence.
Rep. ATWATER proposed the following Amendment No. 80 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\005\INCREASE LGF FUNDING BY $4.5 M - ATWATER.DOCX), which was rejected:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 113, AID TO SUBDIVISIONS - STATE TREASURER, page 247, line 3, opposite /Aid - Local Government Fund/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
4,500,000 4,500,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ATWATER explained the amendment.
Rep. ATWATER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. ATWATER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Bales Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Collins H. A. Crawford Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Fry Gagnon Herbkersman Hiott Hixon Howard Johnson Jordan Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas McCoy Merrill V. S. Moss Pitts Riley Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Ballentine Bamberg Bingham Bowers G. A. Brown Chumley Cobb-Hunter Cole Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Forrester Funderburk George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hicks Hill Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Tallon Tinkler Weeks Whipper Williams
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
Rep. WHITE spoke against the amendment.
Rep. BAMBERG spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. ANTHONY spoke upon the amendment.
Rep. NEAL spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN spoke against the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Atwater Bamberg Bowers G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Chumley Crosby Daning Douglas Funderburk George Gilliard Hardee Hicks Hill Hosey King Knight McEachern M. S. McLeod Norman Norrell Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Rivers J. E. Smith Southard Tallon Whipper
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hiott Hixon Hodges Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Kirby Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Pope Riley Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
The amendment was then rejected.
Rep. ATWATER proposed the following Amendment No. 87 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\005\INCREASE LGF BY $1 MILLION - ATWATER.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 113, AID TO SUBDIVISIONS - STATE TREASURER, page 247, line 3, opposite /Aid - Local Government Fund/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,000,000 1,000,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ATWATER explained the amendment.
Rep. ATWATER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. OTT proposed the following Amendment No. 98 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DKA\5001C005.DKA.SA16.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 113, AID TO SUBDIVISIONS - STATE TREASURER, page 247, line 3, opposite /Aid-local government fund/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
10,630,971 10,630,971
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. OTT explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 98 was out of order because the Amendment appropriated more than five million dollars and did not include the corresponding appropriation decrease in the same section or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation decrease would be made.
The SPEAKER referred to Section 5.3B, stating that an amendment which has the effect of appropriating funds in excess of five millions dollars during the fiscal year stated within the bill shall include within the amendment the corresponding appropriation revenue decrease within the same section that shall fully fund the amendments proposed appropriations or have attached to it a document explaining where the corresponding appropriation revenue decrease would occur. The specific appropriation reduction is made in the State Highway fund. The SPEAKER overruled the Point of Order and ruled Amendment No. 98 to be in order.
Rep. SANDIFER moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley R. L. Brown Clary Clemmons Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Howard Huggins Johnson Jordan Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas McCoy Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Pitts Pope Putnam Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Anthony Bamberg Bowers Brannon G. A. Brown Cobb-Hunter Collins Dillard Douglas Funderburk George Gilliard Govan Hayes Henegan Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod Mitchell Ott Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Southard Weeks
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. KING proposed the following Amendment No. 100 to (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\\INCREASE LGF BY $4.9M.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 113, AID TO SUBDIVISIONS - STATE TREASURER, page 247, line 3, opposite /Aid - Local Government Fund/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
4,900,000 4,900,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. KING explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. WHITE demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon Clary Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Huggins Johnson Jordan Kirby Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas McCoy Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Norman Pitts Pope Putnam Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Bamberg Bowers G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas George Gilliard Henegan Hosey Jefferson King Knight Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod Neal Ott Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Weeks Whipper
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon G. A. Brown R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 113 was adopted.
Rep. BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\school districts flexibility.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 264, paragraph 1.28, line 27, by striking /operations/ and inserting /facilities/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 264, paragraph 1.28, line 29, by striking line 29 in its entirety and inserting /percentage of its per pupil expenditures used for classroom instruction, instructional support, and only transportation, food service and safety within non-instruction pupil services /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 5 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\residential treatment facilities.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 269, paragraph 1.42, after line 15, by inserting:
/RTF facilities on the State Qualified Provider List not located within the boundaries of the state shall be reimbursed at a rate that may not exceed $45 per student per day for education services and school districts shall be eligible to receive a base student cost weighted funding of 2.10 provided that the student remains enrolled in the school district. Facilities providing the educational services shall notify the resident district in writing within forty-five calendar days that a student from the resident district is receiving educational services pursuant to the provisions of the proviso. Reimbursements shall be paid within sixty days of billing, provided the qualified facility has provided a copy of the invoice to both the District Superintendent and the finance office of the resident district being invoiced. Should the facility be unable to reach agreement with the resident school district regarding reasonable costs differences, the provider shall notify the Department of Education's Office of General Counsel. The Department of Education shall facilitate a resolution of the dispute between the facility and the resident school district within forty-five days of the notice of dispute. If the issue of reasonable cost differences should remain unresolved, a facility shall have the right to file a complaint in a Circuit Court. Additionally, qualified RTF providers' general education curriculum must be aligned to the South Carolina academic standards in the core content areas. All students with disabilities who are eligible for special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), as amended, and the State Board of Education (SBE) regulations, as amended, shall receive special education and related services in the least restrictive environment by appropriately certified personnel. Students in a qualified RTF will at all times be eligible to receive the educational credits (e.g., Carnegie Units) earned through their educational efforts. The resident school district and the RTF should develop a memorandum of understanding to outline the responsibilities of the RTF in providing the educational services and responsibilities, if any, of the resident school district while the student is housed in the RFT. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. ANTHONY proposed the following Amendment No. 7 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\reaches coaches.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 276, paragraph 1.66, lines 14-15, by striking /School districts may utilize literacy coaches as interventionists as included in the district reading plan and when supported by assessment data showing the district reading plan is improving literacy/ and inserting /School districts must request a waiver from the State Superintendent of Education in order to utilize literacy coaches as interventionists as included in the district reading plan and when supported by assessment data showing the district reading plan is improving literacy. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ANTHONY explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. G. R. SMITH and LOFTIS proposed the following Amendment No. 90 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\charter school transition funds.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 277, paragraph 1.67, line 17, by striking /for/ and inserting /If funds are available for/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 277, paragraph 1.67, line 18, by striking:/ from the local district or statewide transition funds /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 277, paragraph 1.67, line 19, by inserting after formula.:
/Funds due to charter schools will be determined using Fiscal Year 2016-17 135 Day ADM./
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 277, paragraph 1.67, line 20, by inserting after district.:
/Funds requested may not exceed the difference in Education Finance Act revenue prior to the changes in the funding formula. No transition funds may be allocated to offset a loss in revenue that is the result of a reduction in pupils./
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 277, paragraph 1.67, line 22, by inserting at the end:
/If any excess funds exist, they must be transferred to the Charter School Revolving Loan Program. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. R. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. BINGHAM spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. KING raised the Point of Order that under Section 11-11-140, Amendment No. 90 was out of order in that it appropriated general fund revenues not recognized by the BEA.
The SPEAKER reviewed Section 11-11-140, which prohibits appropriations of surplus general fund revenues in excess of amounts officially recognized as such by the Board of Economic Advisors. The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order and ruled Amendment No. 90 to be out of order.
Rep. BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\teacher salary v2 gf.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part 1B, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 288, paragraph 1.91, line 12, by striking /Teacher Salary Supplement/ and inserting /Education Finance Act/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Part 1B, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 288, paragraph 1.91, line 13 by striking the line in its entirety, and by inserting:
/one percent of the required two percent increase./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 4 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\facility assessment.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 288, after line 20, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(SDE: Facilities Tracking System and Assessment Assistance) Funds appropriated to the Department of Education for facilities assessment shall be used to compile information regarding facilities and maintenance needs of each school district. Charter schools must be included. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 1, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 8 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\008\ SCHOOL DISTRICT FLEX EIA.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1A, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-EIA, page 294, paragraph 1A.14, line 34, by striking /operations/ and inserting /facilities/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1A, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-EIA, page 294, paragraph 1A.14, by striking line 36 in its entirety and inserting /percentage of its per pupil expenditures used for classroom instruction, instructional support, and only transportation, food service and safety within non-instruction pupil services /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. ANTHONY proposed the following Amendment No. 9 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\008\REACHING COACHES EIA.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1A, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-EIA, page 310, paragraph 1A.66, lines 28-29, by striking /school districts may utilize literacy coaches as interventionists as included in the district reading plan and when supported by assessment data showing the district reading plan is improving literacy/ and inserting /school districts must request a waiver from the State Superintendent of Education in order to utilize literacy coaches as interventionists as included in the district reading plan and when supported by assessment data showing the district reading plan is improving literacy. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ANTHONY explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 6 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\008\TEACHER SALARY EIA V2.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part 1B, Section 1A, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - EIA, page 315, paragraph 1A.79, line 21, by striking the line in its entirety, and by inserting :/ one percent of the required two percent increase./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henegan Hicks Hill Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 1A, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 67 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\need-based grants.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 323, paragraph 3.6, after line 20, by inserting:
/( ) Commision on Higher Education--Need-Based Grants $3,000,000 /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bedingfield Chumley Hill Putnam
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 3, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. BINGHAM, COBB-HUNTER, ERICKSON, LONG, PARKS, HAYES and ANTHONY proposed the following Amendment No. 48 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\008\JDLH SUB 1.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 327, paragraph 7.6, lines 15-30, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting /7.6 (JDLH: Transition) The General Assembly recognizes that multiple reports conducted over prior years have highlighted the cost inefficiencies of John de la Howe and the lack of data regarding the impact of the program on student outcomes.
The Board of Trustees of the John de la Howe School will be temporarily suspended for the current fiscal year. To wit, Sections 59-49-20, 59-49-40, 59-49-60, 59-49-80, 59-49-110, and 59-49-140 of the 1976 Code are suspended for the fiscal year. In accordance with the purposes of the will of Dr. John de la Howe, by September 30 of the current fiscal year, an advisory group comprised of one person each designated by the Director of the Department of Social Services, the Director of the Department of Juvenile Justice, the State Superintendent of the Department of Education, the Director of the Department of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services, the Chair of the Joint Citizens and Legislative Committee on Children, a Representative appointed by the Speaker of the House, and a Senator appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate will recommend an educational, vocational, and life skills training program at the John de la Howe School for older youth who are at risk and who are aging out of the foster care or the juvenile justice supervisory programs of the Department of Social Services or the Department of Juvenile Justice. The program will utilize the funds appropriated to John de la Howe School for the costs of the program that will include school drop-out recovery to complete a high school degree, a GED program, vocational and employment training, and an aftercare program for transition of the youth to independent living and employment. Clemson University will collaborate with the advisory group regarding the development of a vocational farming component for the program.
Effective July 1, the funds appropriated to the John de la Howe School will be transferred to a line item contained in the appropriations section for the Department of Juvenile Justice. In consultation with the advisory group and as set forth herein, by November 30, the Department of Juvenile Justice will procure a contract with a non-profit child-service provider to operate the program. The non-profit child-service provider must be a nationally accredited (AdvancED) educational organization experienced in both child protection and juvenile justice programs and must be able to demonstrate a history of success in the operation of educational and vocational residential training programs for youth. The Department of Administration and the Executive Budget Office will assist the Department of Juvenile Justice as needed in the transition.
The Department of Social Services and the Department of Juvenile Justice will provide for the safe transition of the existing residents from John de la Howe School into such placements, programs and services as determined appropriate based on an assessment of their individual needs.
In the development of the program and in the qualifications and selection of the non-profit child-service provider, considerations by the advisory group will include the following:
(1) the overlap of needs of children who crossover for services between the Department of Social Services and the Department of Juvenile Justice;
(2) educational, school drop-out recovery, GED, vocational programs, life skills training programs, career and employment opportunities, and independent living programs for these older youth clients that can be provided using the John de la Howe School facilities, resources, and funding to assist these youth who are at risk and aging out of state services to prepare for success as adults;
(3) aftercare programs that will follow these youths into the community and help them to become established in viable employment and living situations that encourage a future free of homelessness, unemployment, poverty, alcohol and other substance abuse, criminal behavior, and dependence on public assistance;
(4) provide the existing child clients at John de la Howe School with a proper, safe transition to family reunification or other appropriate placements and services;
(5) provide consideration of current John de la Howe School employees, where appropriate, for employment pursuant to the new non-profit provider contract for program services; and,
(6) how the existing funds and youth vocational training programs can be applied to provide repairs and maintenance to the John de la Howe School buildings and grounds.
The Department of Juvenile Justice will provide procurement for the contract, fiscal administration of the funds, contract accountability, compliance, and reporting and will submit reports by June 30th of the current fiscal year and by June 30th of the next fiscal year to the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee, and the Joint Citizens and Legislative Committee on Children to inform the Committees regarding the status and progress of programs, operations, client data, facilities, and budget information. The advisory group may make recommendations to the Governor and General Assembly regarding the future role of the John De La Howe School./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 7, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. MERRILL proposed the following Amendment No. 11 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\college transition .docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 330, paragraph 11.12, line 7, by striking /$179,178/ and inserting /$350,000/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MERRILL explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
Section 11, as amended, was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Burns Chumley Corley Felder Hiott Norman Putnam G. R. Smith Taylor
Section 19 was adopted.
Rep. NEAL proposed the following Amendment No. 12 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\delete cl .docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 27, STATE LIBRARY, page 337, lines 25 - 35, and page 338, lines 1 - 4, paragraph 27.9, by striking the proviso in its entirety.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. STAVRINAKIS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 27, as amended, was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Corley H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 30 was adopted.
Reps. G. M. SMITH, CLYBURN, BALES and COLE proposed the following Amendment No. 22 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\rural health initiative.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, page 345, paragraph 33.27, line 32, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting /33.27. (DHHS: Rural Health Initiative) From the funds appropriated to the Department of Health and Human Services for the Rural Health Initiative, the department shall partner with the University of South Carolina School of Medicine to develop a strategic plan for addressing medically underserved communities throughout the state. The University of South Carolina, School of Medicine will consult with the South Carolina Office of Rural Health in the development and implementation of the strategic plan. The department may leverage any and all available federal funds to implement this initiative.
(A) The Department of Health and Human Services shall develop a plan to address the following provisions:
(1) Rural Healthcare and Education - This initiative will be administered by the USC School of Medicine through a Center of Excellence to support and develop rural medical education and delivery infrastructure in South Carolina through clinical practice, training and research as well as collaboration with other state agencies and institutions. Funding will support Center staffing as well as the programs and collaborations delivering rural health research, the ICARED program, workforce development scholarships and recruitment, rural fellowships, health education development, and rural practice support and education.
(2) Rural Residency Training Enhancement Grants - The department and USC School of Medicine shall determine areas for expanding or enhancing family medicine residency programs, and any other appropriate primary care specialties identified by the Department, into areas not served by Graduate Medical Education programs, in order to expose resident physicians to rural practice and enhance the opportunity to recruit these residents for long term practice in these rural and/or underserved communities. Up to $500,000 of the funds appropriated to the department for the Rural Health Initiative may be used for this purpose. The department and USC School of Medicine shall collaborate to determine a methodology for evaluating proposals and awarding enhancement grants. New training sites and/or residency positions are subject to approval as specified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Applications to the ACGME must be developed no later than June 30, 2017.
(B) The Department of Health and Human Services, in cooperation with the State Fiscal Accountability Authority, shall develop one or more competitive procurements for a facility capable of providing Emergency Care Services in a geographical area determined by the department to be medically underserved. This facility and any equipment shall be exempt from any Department of Health and Environmental Control Certificate of Need requirements or regulations. The facility must provide emergency care and observation beds twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The department shall seek one or more proposals from qualified entities to:
(1) Develop a facility capable of providing emergency care, twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week, and designed to incorporate the utilization of the Statewide Telemedicine Network.
(2) Provide for the delivery of care and the management of daily operations in the facility.
(3) The Center of Excellence, in cooperation with the department, will develop a plan to support and enhance primary care and specialty services in the region surrounding this facility.
(C) The Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office and the Area Health Education Consortium's Office of Healthcare Workforce Analysis and Planning shall provide the department with any information required by the department in order to implement this proviso in accordance with state law and regulations. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. COBB-HUNTER and MITCHELL proposed the following Amendment No. 91 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\healthcare cost.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, page 346, after line 21, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (DHHS: Healthcare Funding for the Uninsured) With the funds appropriated and authorized for the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department shall commission a study to determine the amount of state revenue that is being utilized to provide healthcare to the uninsured and make recommendations on how the state could leverage other funds, such as federal, private grant, and provider fees, and existing programs such as the Healthy Outcomes Initiative and the federal Hospital Disproportionate Share program, to reduce the demand for state revenue and provide greater stability to all current state funded healthcare./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bowers Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell V. S. Moss Neal Norman Ott Parks Pitts Quinn Ridgeway Riley Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bedingfield Hill Putnam
Section 33, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. MURPHY proposed the following Amendment No. 65 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DKA\5001C006.DKA.SA16.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 34, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, page 358, after line 27, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ 34. (DHEC: Coastal Zone Boundary) Of the funds appropriated, the Department of Health and Environmental Control shall report to the General Assembly by January 1, 2017, with an initial recommendation to revise the coastal zone boundary, if any, and the study shall begin with Dorchester County. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MURPHY explained the amendment.
Rep. WHIPPER spoke against the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH spoke in favor of the amendment.
On motion of Rep. G. M. Smith, with unanimous consent, it was ordered that "if any," be included in the language of Amendment No. 65, which was agreed to.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. G. R. SMITH, LOFTIS, STRINGER, CHUMLEY and BURNS proposed the following Amendment No. 68 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\pol sub health.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 34, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, page 358, after line 27, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (DHEC: Management of Healthcare Political Subdivisions) With the funds appropriated or authorized for the Department of Health and Environmental Control in Fiscal Year 2016-2017, the Department shall immediately revoke the license of any Healthcare operation that is also a Political Subdivision of South Carolina in the event that the governing board of the Political Subdivision attempts, votes, contracts, or takes any action to subcontract, lease, sublease, assign, convey, or in any manner rid itself of its duties enumerated in state law to operate the Political Subdivision Healthcare System./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. R. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. BANNISTER raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 68 is not germane to the bill.
The SPEAKER overruled the Point of Order and ruled Amendment No. 68 to be in order.
Rep. BANNISTER spoke against the amendment and moved to table the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hodges Huggins Jefferson Jordan King Kirby Limehouse Long Lowe McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Parks Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Tinkler Weeks Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Burns Chumley Corley Hill Loftis Pitts G. R. Smith Stringer
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bales Bedingfield Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Dillard Douglas Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 34, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. G. M. SMITH, CLYBURN, BALES and COLE proposed the following Amendment No. 23 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\dss tuition loan.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 38, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, page 367, after line 24, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(Tuition Reimbursement/Student Loan Repayment) The Department of Social Services is allowed to spend state, federal, and other sources of revenue to provide tuition reimbursement and/or student loan repayment to aid in retaining caseworkers and critical needs department jobs based on objective guidelines established by the State Director of the Department of Social Services.
The department may also provide paid educational leave for any employees in an FTE position to attend class while enrolled in programs that are related to the agency's mission. All such leave is at the agency head's discretion.
The department may enter into an agreement with staff employed in critical need departments to repay them for their outstanding student loans and/or reimburse tuition expenses. The employee must be employed in a critical needs area, which would be identified at the agency head's discretion, be in a covered FTE, and not have any disciplinary actions. Participants in this program must agree to remain at the Department for a period of five years. The department may pay these employees up to $7,500 each year over a five-year period in accordance with a program developed by the Department. Payments will be made directly to the employee at the end of each year of employment. Payments cannot exceed the balance of the student loan or the cost of tuition./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Bedingfield Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn H. A. Crawford Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Kirby Limehouse Loftis Long McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Norman Pitts Putnam Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Southard Tallon Tinkler Weeks White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 38, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. HIXON and HERBKERSMAN proposed the following Amendment No. 56 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\prt welcome center complex mowing.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 49, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 374, after line 13, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(PRT: Welcome Center Complex Mowing), which was adopted: Of the funds appropriated for State Welcome Centers, the department is directed to ensure that at every Welcome Centers complex, the outer edge of the pavement of the adjacent highway, the highway control of access right of way line, and all boundaries surrounding the complex must be mowed in a manner to ensure that the entirety of the grounds are uniform in appearance. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HIXON explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. CLEMMONS proposed the following Amendment No. 57 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\005\PRT BEACH ACCESS PROVISO.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 49, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 374, after line 13, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(PRT: Beach Access) Of the funds appropriated for state parks, the department shall utilize such funds to open pedestrian, non-motorized vehicular and golf cart ingress and egress to Myrtle Beach State Park at the intersection of US Highway 17 and Center South Road in Myrtle Beach, and / or at other location(s) which legally and safely affords such ingress and egress. Said access shall be subject to the rules and regulations of the department governing uniform closure of park ingress during periods of peak usage. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. CLEMMONS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bradley Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Lucas McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 49, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. BINGHAM and LOFTIS proposed the following Amendment No. 14 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\commercetrucking.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 376, after line 31, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(CMRC: Study of Employment of Entry-Level CDL Drivers by State and Local Agencies) From the funds appropriated to the Department of Commerce, the department shall establish a study committee to identify how best to facilitate and incentivize state and local government fleet operations in the hiring of entry-level Commercial Drivers' License holders. The study committee shall develop recommendations for the General Assembly to consider which include, but are not limited to, coordination and cooperation with the Department of Education and the State Technical College system; minimal and/or targeted agency entry-level employment-level objectives; state-sponsored incentives; limitations on liability; state-sponsored insurance coverage underwriting for some initial period of employment; payroll tax exemptions or incentives; and other state-sponsored support.
The study committee shall be comprised of ten members as follows:
(1) two members appointed by the Governor, one of whom is an employee of the South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund and one of whom is an employee of the Department of Administration;
(2) two members appointed by the Chairman of the House Education and Public Works Committee, one of whom is a member of the committee and one of whom is an employee of the Department of Education;
(3) two members appointed by the Chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee, one of whom is a member of the committee and one of whom is an employee of the Technical College System;
(4) one member appointed by the Secretary of Transportation;
(5) one member appointed by the South Carolina Municipal Association;
(6) one member appointed by the South Carolina Association of Counties; and
(7) one member appointed by the South Carolina Trucking Association.
Members of the study committee shall possess experience and expertise in human resources, safety, risk, fleet management, or other areas consistent with this objective. Staff support shall be provided by the Department of Commerce, with assistance from the staffs of the Senate Transportation Committee and the House Education and Public Works Committee, upon request. Findings and recommendations shall be submitted to the General Assembly by October 31, 2016./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Taylor Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 50, as amended, was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bedingfield Bradley Brannon Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill D. C. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Taylor Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 52 was adopted.
Reps. WHITE and SIMRILL proposed the following Amendment No. 13 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\water and sewer proviso.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 54, RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY, page 377, after line 26, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(RIA: Statewide Water and Sewer Fund) The Rural Infrastructure Authority shall use the funds allocated for the Statewide Water and Sewer Fund to assist qualified infrastructure projects not eligible for the Rural Infrastructure Fund. The Authority shall utilize the same procedures and guidelines established for the Rural Infrastructure Fund to select qualified projects for the Statewide Water and Sewer Fund. The authority may carry forward from the prior fiscal year into the current fiscal year, funds appropriated to the Statewide Water and Sewer Fund./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 54, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. PITTS, POPE, COBB-HUNTER, CLEMMONS, HOSEY and ERICKSON proposed the following Amendment No. 27 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\cdv summary court proviso pcc.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 60, PROSECUTION COORDINATION COMMISSION, page 383, after line 14, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(Summary Court Domestic Violence Fund Distribution) The Summary Court Domestic Violence Prosecution funding shall be distributed based upon ten percent of the average incoming caseload for each county as reported by the South Carolina Judicial Department for the prior 3 fiscal years./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PITTS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 60, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. WILLIAMS proposed the following Amendment No. 74 (Doc Name COUNCIL\BBM\5001C016.BBM.DG16.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 64, LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING COUNCIL, page 391, after line 36, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ 64. . (LETC: Transfer for Domestic Violence) From the funds apporpiated, the Law Enforcement Training Council shall transfer $400,000 to the Commission for Minority Affairs for a domestic violence program. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WILLIAMS explained the amendment.
Rep. PITTS moved to table the amendment.
Rep. WILLIAMS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Brannon Clary Clemmons Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hayes Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lucas M. S. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Norman Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Riley Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bamberg Bowers Bradley R. L. Brown Clyburn George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hart Hodges Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Lowe Mack McKnight Neal Ryhal J. E. Smith Whipper Williams Yow
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 64 was adopted.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. LONG a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.
Reps. COBB-HUNTER and MITCHELL proposed the following Amendment No. 105 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\health ad hoc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 91, LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT, page 416, after line 9, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (LEG: Healthcare Funding for the Uninsured) From the funds appropriated to the House of Representatives and the Senate, there is created an ad hoc study committee to address the issue of determining the amount of state revenue that is being utilized to provide healthcare to the uninsured. The committee shall be comprised of nine members appointed as follows: one member appointed by the Speaker of the House, one member appointed by the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, one member appointed by the House Majority Leader, one member appointed by the House Minority Leader, one member appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, one member appointed by the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, one member appointed by the Senate Majority Leader, one member appointed by the Senate Minority Leader and one member appointed by the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services. Appointees should have knowledge and/or experience in the areas of healthcare and/or health insurance. Staff for the ad hoc study committee shall be provided by the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee.
The committee shall make recommendations on how the state could leverage federal funds, private grants, provider fees, and existing programs such as the Healthy Outcomes Initiative and the federal Hospital Disproportionate Share program to reduce the demand for state revenue and provide greater stability to all current state funded healthcare. A report on the committee's findings and recommendations shall be submitted to the members of the General Assembly by February 1, 2017./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. TAYLOR moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Atwater Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas McCoy Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Norman Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bowers R. L. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Funderburk George Gilliard Govan Hart Hayes Henegan Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Mitchell Neal Norrell Ott Parks Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Stavrinakis Tinkler Weeks Whipper Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 91 was adopted.
Reps. WHITE, COBB-HUNTER and HERBKERSMAN proposed the following Amendment No. 36 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\employee pay raise proviso 117.118.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 485, paragraph 117.118, lines 5,8,11,12,14,17,19, 21 and 23, by striking /one/ and inserting /two/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 54 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\117.118 PAY INCREASE 3%.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 485, paragraph 117.118, lines 5, 8, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21 and 23, by striking /one/ and inserting /three/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 55 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\117.118 PAY INCREASE 2.5%.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 485, paragraph 117.118, lines 5, 8, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21 and 23, by striking /one/ and inserting /two and one-half/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. DOUGLAS proposed the following Amendment No. 103 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\pay plan less than 75k.docx), which was rejected:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 485, paragraph 117.118, lines 1 - 32, by striking the proviso in its entirety and by inserting:
/ 117.118. (GP: Employee Compensation) The amounts appropriated to the Department of Administration F300-Statewide Employee Benefits for Employee Pay Increases must be allocated by the department Department of Administration, Executive Budget Office to the various state agencies to provide for employee pay increases for state employees whose annual equivalent salary on July 1, 2016, is less than $75,000 in accordance with the following plan:
(1) With respect to classified and non-judge judicial classified employees, effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year, the compensation of all classified employees shall be increased by zero two percent.
(2) With respect to unclassified and non-judge judicial unclassified employees or unclassified executive compensation system employees not elsewhere covered in this act, effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year the compensation of all unclassified employees shall be increased by zero two percent. Any employee subject to the provisions of this paragraph shall not be eligible for compensation increases provided in paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, or 6.
(3) Effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year, agency heads not covered by the Agency Head Salary Commission, shall receive an annualized base pay increase of zero two percent.
(4) With respect to local health care providers compensation increases shall be zero two percent effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year. With respect to Area Agencies on Aging funded by the Lieutenant Governor's Office on Aging, compensation shall be increased by zero two percent effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year. With respect to local councils on aging or local providers of services funded by the Lieutenant Governor's Office on Aging through Area Agencies on Aging, no pay increases will be allowed. School Bus Driver salary and fringe funding to school districts shall be increased by zero two percent.
(5) Effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year, the Chief Justice and other judicial officers shall receive an annualized base pay increase of zero two percent.
(6) Effective on the first pay date that occurs on or after July first of the current fiscal year, county auditors and county treasurers shall receive an annualized base pay increase of zero two percent.
(7) For Fiscal Year 2016-17, the Executive Budget Office is directed to review Executive Branch agencies to determine whether their budgets warrant an other fund authorization increase due to the two percent compensation increase for all full-time employees. If so warranted, the Executive Budget Office shall work with the Office of the Comptroller General to increase such authorization for the affected agencies.
Notwithstanding the provisions of items (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6), state employees whose annual equivalent salary is $75,000 or greater on July, 1, 2016, shall not be eligible to receive the two percent base pay increase.
The Department of Administration shall allocate associated compensation increases for retirement employer contributions based on the retirement rate of the retirement system in which individual employees participate.
The Executive Director of the State Fiscal Accountability Authority is authorized to use excess appropriations for the current fiscal year designated for statewide employer contributions for other statewide purposes. At the discretion of the Executive Director of the State Fiscal Accountability Authority, such action may be considered a permanent transfer into the receiving agency's base budget.
Funds appropriated in Part IA, F300, Section 106, Statewide Employee Benefits may be carried forward from the prior fiscal year into the current fiscal year. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. DOUGLAS explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment, which was not agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bamberg Bowers R. L. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Felder Gagnon George Gilliard Govan Hardee Hart Hayes Henegan Hill Hodges Hosey Howard King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss Neal Norman Norrell Ott Parks Putnam Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson J. E. Smith Southard Tinkler Weeks Whipper Williams Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Atwater Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Delleney Duckworth Erickson Forrester Fry Goldfinch Hamilton Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Limehouse Lowe McCoy Merrill V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Pitts Pope Quinn Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis
So, the amendment was rejected.
Reps. BINGHAM and ERICKSON proposed the following Amendment No. 59 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\revolving loan fund.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 490, paragraph 117.129, lines 15 - 18, by striking the proviso in its entirety./(GP: Revolving Loan Fund) By July 15, 2016, the State Treasurer shall issue a request for proposal for a South Carolina non-profit corporation to manage the application and review process of the Charter School Facility Revolving Loan Program established in Section 59-40-175, of the 1976 Code. Funds shall be made available to approved applicants no later than October 1 each year so that facility plans may proceed for the following school year./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ERICKSON explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. KIRBY, PITTS, WHITE and LOWE proposed the following Amendment No. 28 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\007\KIRBY, LYNCHES RIVER BOAT LANDING.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 491, paragraph 117.132, line 7, after maintenance; by striking:/ and /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 491, paragraph 117.132, line 8, after replacement by inserting: /; and $1,000,000 shall be transferred to the Department of Natural Resources for a boat landing at Lynches River /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PITTS explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bedingfield Brannon Burns Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Gagnon George Goldfinch Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas McEachern McKnight Merrill Mitchell V. S. Moss Murphy Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer G. R. Smith Sottile Tallon Taylor Wells White Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Atwater Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bingham Bowers Bradley R. L. Brown Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Funderburk Gilliard Hamilton Hart Hill Hosey Huggins Mack McCoy M. S. McLeod D. C. Moss Neal Newton Norman Norrell Parks Quinn Robinson-Simpson Simrill G. M. Smith J. E. Smith Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tinkler Weeks Whipper
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. CLEMMONS proposed the following Amendment No. 25 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\clemmons, step deletion .docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 492, paragraph 117.134, lines 5 - 8, by striking the proviso in its entirety.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. CLEMMONS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 20 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\sbdc .docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 492, after line 22, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (GP: Small Business Development Centers) Clemson University, the University of South Carolina, Winthrop University, South Carolina State University, and the South Carolina Department of Commerce are prohibited from utilizing state funds for the operation of their respective Small Business Development Centers./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. FORRESTER spoke against the amendment.
Rep. BRANNON moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. RUTHERFORD proposed the following Amendment No. 96 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\state employee leave donation.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 492, after line 22, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(GP: State Employee Leave Donation), which was adopted: A state employee may make a written request to the employing agency that a specified number of hours of his accrued annual and/or sick leave be transferred from his annual and/or sick leave account to a specific leave recipient rather than to a leave pool account. An employee with less than fifteen days in his sick leave account may not transfer any sick leave to the recipient, and an employee with more than fifteen days in his sick leave account may transfer sick leave to the recipient if he retains a minimum of fifteen days in his own sick leave account. Once leave of an employee has been transferred to the recipient, it may not be restored or returned to the leave donor./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. RUTHERFORD explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. KING proposed the following Amendment No. 102 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\legislative delegation office space.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 492, after line 22, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(GP: Legislative Delegation Office Space), which was tabled: In the current fiscal year, a member of a legislative delegation is permitted to expend funds for office space and personnel utilizing the legislative delegation's funds, without the consent of the entire legislative delegation./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. KING explained the amendment.
Rep. NORMAN moved to table the amendment.
The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 47 to 45.
Rep. NORRELL proposed the following Amendment No. 106 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\gr retirement system.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 492, after line 22, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (GP: General Assembly Retirement System) for Fiscal Year 2016-17 any member of the General Assembly who is not a member of the General Assembly Retirement System may choose to opt into the system./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. NORRELL explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE raised the Point of Order that under Rule 5.3B, Amendment No. 106 to H. 5001, the General Appropriation Bill, was out of order as it was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. NORRELL spoke against the Point.
Rep. OTT spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE sustained the point of order and ruled Amendment No. 106 out of order.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 117, as amended, was adopted.
Reps. SIMRILL, COLLINS, NORMAN, BALLENTINE, HUGGINS, ATWATER, BEDINGFIELD, HAMILTON, G. R. SMITH and QUINN proposed the following Amendment No. 101 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\004\MVST TO SHF. DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 502, lines 35 - 36, and page 503, lines 1 - 6, paragraph 118.14, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting the following: /(SR: Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Revenue) For the current fiscal year, the State Treasurer shall transfer $65,680,000 from Motor Vehicle Sales Tax revenues credited to the general fund to the State Highway Fund./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. SIMRILL explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
McKnight
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. HAYES, WHITE, BINGHAM, ANTHONY and GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 15 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\008\ABBEVILLE TRR. DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 503, paragraph 118.16, line 23, by striking /$138,518,632/ and inserting /$139,260,007/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 503, paragraph 118.16, line 24, by striking: /and/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 503, paragraph 118.16, line 25, by striking: /./ and inserting /;/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 503, paragraph 118.16, after line 25, by inserting:
/ (6) $5,494,506 from Fiscal Year 2015-16 F30 Carry Forward and Bonus Lapse./
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 504, paragraph 118.16, after line 9, by inserting an appropriately numbered subitem to read: / ( ) Districts with a Poverty Index of Eighty Percent or Higher $9,058,672 /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 504, paragraph 118.16, line 10, opposite (a) Technology Technical Assistance by striking: /$16,800,000/ and by inserting: /$13,977,209 /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 504, paragraph 118.16, after line 12, by inserting an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ ( .1) The Department of Education shall allocate the $9,058,672 appropriated above for districts with a poverty index of eighty percent or higher to provide for Teacher Recruitment and Retention. The funds shall be allocated on a pro rata basis to each district based on the districts 45 day student enrollment count. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. SIMRILL, WHITE, LUCAS and LIMEHOUSE proposed the following Amendment No. 107 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\ AMEND\H-WM\004\NR SHF LANG.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 504, paragraph 118.16 Item (2), lines 1 and 2, by striking the item in its entirety and inserting:
/(2) U120 - Department of Transportation
State Highway Fund $135,000,000
(2.1) Funds appropriated above in item 2 shall be credited to the State Highway Fund for paving, rehabilitation, resurfacing, and/or reconstruction of the Primary Road System. Unexpended funds appropriated pursuant to this subsection may be carried forward and expended for the same purposes. /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, after line 32, by inserting:
/ (C) Of the funds appropriated or authorized to the Department of Transportation, the department shall develop and implement a needs-based weighting methodology to allocate funding within the state funded resurfacing program, which shall include consideration on a county-by-county basis, to ensure that each county in the state is guaranteed funding./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. SIMRILL explained the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. D. C. MOSS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. OTT spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. W. J. MCLEOD spoke upon the amendment.
Rep. NEAL spoke against the amendment.
Rep. BAMBERG spoke against the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon George Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas McCoy McEachern W. J. McLeod Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Norman Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Tinkler Weeks Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Bamberg Bowers R. L. Brown Crosby Funderburk Gilliard Hardee Hart Hill Hodges Hosey Howard Mack McKnight M. S. McLeod Neal Norrell Parks Robinson-Simpson Ryhal J. E. Smith Taylor Wells
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. R. L. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 16 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\004\RB BOOK MOBILE 2.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, after line 32, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) H870 - State Library
Colleton County Bookmobile Replacement $200,000 /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. R. L. BROWN explained the amendment.
Rep. R. L. BROWN moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Reps. R. L. BROWN and BAMBERG proposed the following Amendment No. 17 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\004\RB BOOKMOBILE 2.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, after line 32, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) H870 - State Library
Colleton County Bookmobile Replacement $150,000 /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. R. L. BROWN explained the amendment.
Rep. R. L. BROWN moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. DANING proposed the following Amendment No. 39 to (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\004\USS CLAMA-GORE.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, after line 32, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) P360 - Patriots Point
USS Clamagore Restoration (Requires 2:1 Match) $1,000,000/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. DANING explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. DANING demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Dillard Duckworth Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Loftis Lowe Lucas Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Neal Norman Pitts Putnam Quinn Riley Ryhal Sandifer G. R. Smith Southard Spires Tallon Taylor Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Atwater Bamberg Bowers Bradley Chumley Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Felder Finlay Funderburk George Gilliard Goldfinch Hayes Henegan Hill King Kirby Limehouse Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Murphy Newton Norrell Ott Pope Ridgeway Rivers Robinson-Simpson Simrill G. M. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Stavrinakis Tinkler Weeks
So, the amendment was tabled.
Reps. J. E. SMITH, OTT, COBB-HUNTER, W. J. MCLEOD, BAMBERG, RUTHERFORD and GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 58 (Doc Name COUNCIL\BBM\5001C014. BBM.DG16.DOCX), which was rejected:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, after line 32, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ 118.___. (SR: Fuel Surcharge) (A) In the current fiscal year, there is imposed a surcharge of ten cents a gallon on all gasoline, gasohol, blended fuels containing gasoline that are used or consumed for any purpose in this State, all diesel fuel, substitute fuels, or alternative fuels, or blended fuels containing diesel fuel that are used or consumed in this State in producing or generating power for propelling motor vehicles. The surcharge imposed pursuant to this subsection must be imposed, collected, administered, and credited in the same manner as the motor fuel user fee imposed pursuant to Section 12-28-310.
(B) In the current fiscal year, there is imposed a surcharge upon every motor carrier for the privilege of using the streets and highways in this State. The surcharge is equivalent to ten cents a gallon, calculated on the amount of gasoline or other motor fuel used by the motor carrier in its operations within this State. The surcharge imposed pursuant to this subsection must be imposed, collected, administered, and credited in the same manner as the road tax imposed pursuant to Section 56-11-410. Every motor carrier subject to the surcharge imposed pursuant to this subsection is entitled to a credit on the surcharge equivalent to ten cents per gallon on all gasoline or other motor fuel purchased by the carrier within this State for use in operations either within or without this State and upon which gasoline or other motor fuel tax or surcharge imposed by the laws of this State has been paid by the carrier. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. J. E. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. OTT spoke in favor of the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bernstein Bowers R. L. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Funderburk George Gilliard Govan Hart Hayes Henegan Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson King Limehouse Mack McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Mitchell Neal Ott Parks Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Stavrinakis Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper Williams
Those who voted in the negative are:
Atwater Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Lowe Lucas McCoy McEachern Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Norman Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor White Whitmire Willis Yow
So, the amendment was rejected.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 70 (Doc Name COUNCIL\BBM\5001C015.BBM.DG16.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, after line 32, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ 118.___. (SR: Earned Income Tax Credit) For the income tax year that ends in the current fiscal year, there is allowed as a credit against the tax imposed pursuant to Section 12-6-510 on a full-year resident individual taxpayer an amount equal to three and one-half percent of the earned income tax credit (EITC) allowed the taxpayer pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 32. If the amount of the credit allowed by this section exceeds the tax imposed on the taxpayer pursuant to Section 12-6-510, the excess must be refunded to the taxpayer. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. J. E. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 104 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\005\$3 M FOR FLOOD RELIEF - J SMITH.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, item 32 E240 - Office of Adjutant General after line 24, by inserting an appropriately numbered subitem and provision to read:
/( ) EMD - Flood Disaster Relief $3,000,000/
( ) Of the $3,000,000 appropriated above for EMD - Flood Disaster Relief, funding shall be distributed to low-income families who are in need of residential home repairs due to the October 2015 Floods. Prior to distribution of funds the office of the Emergency Management Division shall verify that a family has been affected by the October 2015 flooding. Receipt of this funding must not disqualify a person from receiving funding from FEMA.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. J. E. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. J. E. SMITH demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Atwater Ballentine Bannister Bedingfield Bingham Bradley Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Henderson Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas McCoy Merrill D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Norman Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bernstein Bowers R. L. Brown Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Funderburk George Gilliard Govan Hart Hayes Herbkersman Hodges Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Mitchell Neal Ott Parks Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford J. E. Smith Tinkler Weeks Whipper Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. J. E. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 108 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\columbia museum of art 250k.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, item 34 P280 - Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism after line 32, by inserting an appropriately numbered subitem to read:
/( ) Columbia Museum of Art $250,000/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. J. E. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. J. E. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 109 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\005\COLUMBIA MUSEUM OF ART 100K.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 506, paragraph 118.16, item 34 P280 - Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism after line 32, by inserting an appropriately numbered subitem to read:
/( ) Columbia Museum of Art $100,000/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. J. E. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. J. E. SMITH demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Atwater Bannister Bedingfield Bradley Brannon Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Gagnon Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Johnson Jordan Limehouse Lowe Lucas D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Norman Pitts Pope Putnam Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Tallon Taylor Wells White Whitmire Willis
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bernstein Bingham Bowers R. L. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Finlay Funderburk George Gilliard Govan Hart Hayes Henegan Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Mitchell Neal Ott Parks Quinn Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford G. M. Smith J. E. Smith Tinkler Weeks Whipper Williams Yow
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bernstein Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 118, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. WHITE moved to reconsider the vote whereby Part IA, Section 99 was rejected, which was agreed to.
Rep. BRADLEY proposed the following Amendment No. 92 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\defund rsic commissioners. docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 99, RETIREMENT SYSTEM INVESTMENT COMMISSION, page 228, line 5, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Column 3 by:
Column 3 Column 4
100,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BRADLEY explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bedingfield Bingham Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Crosby Daning Delleney Douglas Duckworth Erickson Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon George Goldfinch Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Howard Huggins Johnson Jordan King Limehouse Loftis Lucas McKnight W. J. McLeod V. S. Moss Murphy Newton Norman Pope Putnam Ridgeway Riley Rivers Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Tallon Taylor Weeks Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Bamberg Bannister Bernstein Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Dillard Felder Fry Gilliard Govan Henegan Herbkersman Hodges Hosey Jefferson Kirby Knight Lowe Mack McEachern M. S. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss Neal Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Quinn Robinson-Simpson Rutherford G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Stavrinakis Tinkler Wells White
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the Section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bernstein Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Merrill
Section 99, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. WHITE moved to table all pending motions to reconsider, which was agreed to.
Rep. WHITE gave notice of offering amendments on third reading if necessary, pursuant to Rule 9.2.
The question then recurred to the passage of the Bill.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bernstein Bingham Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
So, the Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33 and 76
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Todd Atwater
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Justin Bamberg
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Bruce W. Bannister
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Beth Bernstein
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, All Sections
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Kenneth A. Bingham
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 112
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Jeffrey A. Bradley
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 4, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. N. Douglas Brannon
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 57 and 66
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Gary E. Clary
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(B) and (C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Alan Clemmons
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 34, 35, 37, 38, 45, 63 and 67
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 38, 58, 61, 63, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 83, 105, 106, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. J. Derham Cole, Jr.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Neal A. Collins
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 74, 75, 76, 81 and 84
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Christopher A. Corley
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Section 16
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Heather A. Crawford
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Joe Daning
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. F. Greg Delleney
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Sections 1, 11, 16, 25, 34, 47, 82 and 87, Part IB, Sections 34, 37, 82 and 87
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Gregory D. Duckworth
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 38
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Shannon S. Erickson
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 78
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Raye Felder
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 44 and 118
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Kirkman Finlay
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Mike Forrester
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Russell Fry
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 20A and 58
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Laurie Slade Funderburk
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 44 and 113
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Michael W. Gambrell
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 15, 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Stephen Goldfinch, Jr.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, and Part II, Sections 33, 34, 61, 63, 66, 74, 75, 82 and 84
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Christopher R. Hart
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Jenny A. Horne
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Jeffrey E. Johnson
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Jay Jordan
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Ralph S. Kennedy, Jr.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 82 and 84, Amd. No. 1
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Roger K. Kirby
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, and Part II, Sections 32, 33, 36, 74, and 75
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Phillip D. Lowe
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 83, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. James H. Lucas
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 23, 33 and 34
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. David J. Mack III
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 13, 38, 57, 58, 61, 63, 66, 67, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 81, 82, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Peter M. McCoy, Jr.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 66, 65, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Cezar E. McKnight
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 34, 58, 66, 74, 75 and 76
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Walton J. McLeod
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 33
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Dennis C. Moss
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Christopher J. Murphy
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Weston J. Newton
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 61, 66, 65, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Mandy Powers Norrell
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IB, Section 118, Amendment No. 29
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Russell Ott
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. J. Anne Parks
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 57, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Thomas E. Pope
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. J. Todd Rutherford
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 11, 20A, 20B, 20C, 20D, 20E, 20F, 20G, 20H, 13, 23, 33, 34, 35, 38, 49, 50, 51, 52, 58, 59, 61, 63, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. James E. Smith, Jr.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 17, 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 38, 58, 61, 63, 66, 67, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 81, 82, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Leonidas E. Stavrinakis
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 81
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Mary Tinkler
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745 (B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. J. David Weeks
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Sections 33, 34, 38, 58, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. J. Seth Whipper
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA, Part IB, Section 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. W. Brian White
H. 5002--AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING
The following Joint Resolution was taken up:
H. 5002 (Word version) -- Ways and Means Committee: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE MONIES FROM THE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016, AND TO ALLOW UNEXPENDED FUNDS APPROPRIATED TO BE CARRIED FORWARD TO SUCCEEDING FISCAL YEARS AND EXPENDED FOR THE SAME PURPOSES.
Reps. HAYES, WHITE, ANTHONY, GOVAN and BINGHAM proposed the following Amendment No. 1 Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\crf-crf abbeville trial and plaintiff districts supplement.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 1, page 1, line 27, opposite School Bus Lease or Purchase, by striking /$10,000,000/ and inserting /$7,177,209/
Amend the Joint Resolution further, as and if amended, Section 1, page 6, after line 8, by inserting an appropriately numbered item to read:/ ( ) H630 -Department of Education Technology Technical Assistance $2,822,791/
Renumber items and sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BINGHAM explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bernstein Bingham Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. LIMEHOUSE and J. E. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\crf-uss laffey.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 1, page 6, after line 8, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/P360 - Patriot's Point Development Authority
USS Laffey $50,000
Renumber items and sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. LIMEHOUSE explained the amendment.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bannister Bernstein Bowers Bradley Brannon R. L. Brown Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Duckworth Erickson Finlay Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hart Hayes Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Limehouse Lucas Mack McCoy M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pope Quinn Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Tinkler Wells White Whitmire Williams Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Atwater Ballentine Bedingfield H. A. Crawford Douglas Felder Forrester Fry Hamilton Hardee Hixon Johnson Jordan Lowe McEachern McKnight Norman Pitts Putnam Ridgeway G. R. Smith Taylor Weeks Whipper Willis
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the passage of the Joint Resolution.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bedingfield Bowers Bradley R. L. Brown Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins H. A. Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Fry Funderburk Gagnon George Gilliard Goldfinch Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hicks Hill Hiott Hixon Hodges Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Limehouse Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McEachern McKnight M. S. McLeod W. J. McLeod Merrill Mitchell D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy Neal Newton Norman Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Quinn Ridgeway Riley Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Ryhal Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Southard Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Tinkler Weeks Wells Whipper White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
So, the Joint Resolution, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
As I have in years past, I will recuse myself on Sections H390, H510 and P160 of the Capital Reserve Bill. While I do not believe I have a legal conflict on voting on any of these agencies' budgets, I am recusing myself to avoid the appearance of a conflict. I am in business with individuals who, in their other businesses unrelated to me, may have connections to these agencies.
Rep. Rick Quinn
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Bill Number H. 5002-Capital Reserve Fund
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Kenneth Bingham
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Bill Number H. 5002-Capital Reserve Fund
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Mike Forrester
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Bill Number H. 5002-Capital Reserve Fund
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Brian White
HOUSE TO MEET AT 11:00 A.M. TOMORROW
Rep. WHITE moved that when the House adjourns it adjourn to meet at 11:00 a.m. tomorrow, which was agreed to.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER moved that the House do now adjourn, which was agreed to.
Rep. HAYES moved that when the House adjourns, it adjourn in memory of Christopher Ray, which was agreed to.
At 11:56 p.m. the House, in accordance with the motion of Rep. HAYES, adjourned in memory of Christopher Ray, to meet at 11:00 a.m. tomorrow.
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:45 P.M.